PALMisLIFE 討論區

標題: [情報] SJ30 的測試報告 Part II [列印本頁]

作者: Robin    時間: 2002-9-11 13:37
標題: [情報] SJ30 的測試報告 Part II
  
Palm Infocenter 有 Ed 的 SJ30 Review Part II
比之前的 Part I 詳盡一些
  
http://www.palminfocenter.com/
  
文中對 SJ30 的電力很滿意
看來可以考慮敗一台
  
節錄文中測試結果:
以下是連續開機, 普通使用, 直到第一次出現電力警告為止
背光 25% = 9.5小時
背光 50% = 6小時
背光 100% = 3小時
[$nbsp][$nbsp]
作者: 北極星    時間: 2002-9-11 21:41
標題: Re:[情報] SJ30 的測試報告 Part II
hmmm 用山田大神的BATTERY BENCH 2 測試下
s60(不是s50喔)連續100%背光至少都有4小時20分鐘的實力
SL30還是略遜一籌 可以推測s50確定是王者無疑了
  
參考:
http://www.palmislife.com/cgi-bin/ut/topic_show.cgi?id=6000&h=1&bpg=2&age=30  

作者: 北極星    時間: 2002-9-11 21:47
標題: Re:[情報] SJ30 的測試報告 Part II
順便標示一下原文:
  
Battery Life
I always test the battery life on handhelds the same way. First, I install an application named UpTime. This tracks the amount of time a handheld is active between each recharge. Then I use it normally, reading AvantGo, playing games, looking up phone numbers, that sort of thing.  
  
Because the major battery drain that is under the user's control is the backlight, I did several tests with the backlight set on different levels.  
  
With the backlight at half power, the first battery warning came after exactly 6 hours of use. I think this is the most realistic test, as most people tend to keep the backlight set somewhere near half power.  
  
With the backlight at full power, the first battery warning came after just 3 hours of use.  
  
Finally, I wanted to see what was the maximum time I could get. With the backlight at about one quarter power, which I consider the minimum, the first battery warning came after 9 and a half hours of use. I didn't try it with the backlight all the way down or off because I think the screen is to dim to be useful with the backlight below one quarter power.  
  
http://www.palminfocenter.com/view_Story.asp?ID=4140
作者: 阿輝    時間: 2002-9-11 21:58
標題: Re:[情報] SJ30 的測試報告 Part II
嗯.. SJ30 我到挺有興趣的..
  
應該有頗多可以 DIY 的..@@~
  
ex BT 改內建... GSM/GPRS 改內建




歡迎光臨 PALMisLIFE 討論區 (http://f.pil.tw/) Powered by Discuz! X2.5